<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ultra Vires Acts: Why Nonprofits Must Follow Their Articles &amp; Bylaws</title>
	<atom:link href="http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/</link>
	<description>Daily Dose of Nonprofit Law</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 14 Jan 2012 02:31:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tish</title>
		<link>http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-495</link>
		<dc:creator>Tish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Sep 2010 00:55:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charitylawyerblog.com/?p=793#comment-495</guid>
		<description>I would like to sue my HOA.  We have just finished a quiet title action (I lost) because even though the CCR&#039;s and the bylaws say it is a mandatory HOA, they stood up in court and said it was voluntary, only to send me an email to say once again it was mandatory less than 24 hours later and provided me the same documents we started with.  Since I have the declarations they provided to the court and the recorded bylaws and CCR&#039;s what do you think the chances are of making them pick voluntary or mandatory and sticking with it for more than 24 hours?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to sue my HOA.  We have just finished a quiet title action (I lost) because even though the CCR&#8217;s and the bylaws say it is a mandatory HOA, they stood up in court and said it was voluntary, only to send me an email to say once again it was mandatory less than 24 hours later and provided me the same documents we started with.  Since I have the declarations they provided to the court and the recorded bylaws and CCR&#8217;s what do you think the chances are of making them pick voluntary or mandatory and sticking with it for more than 24 hours?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Betty</title>
		<link>http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-408</link>
		<dc:creator>Betty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 00:40:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charitylawyerblog.com/?p=793#comment-408</guid>
		<description>Great posting.  It&#039;s scary how often this question of following bylaws comes up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great posting.  It&#8217;s scary how often this question of following bylaws comes up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Kirkland</title>
		<link>http://charitylawyerblog.com/2010/07/14/nonprofit-law-jargon-buster-ultra-vires-acts/comment-page-1/#comment-393</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Kirkland</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Jul 2010 15:15:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://charitylawyerblog.com/?p=793#comment-393</guid>
		<description>Very interesting!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very interesting!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

