Delegating activities to committees and other qualified individuals can be helpful for nonprofit boards that are short on the time or expertise needed to carry out certain functions. For example, nonprofit boards typically delegate the day to day management of the organization to officers such as theÂ C.E.O./Executive Director. Boards alsoÂ delegate specific tasks to committeesÂ who can devote more time to particular matters.
Nonprofits are increasingly subject to growing regulatory burdens and high expectations from donors, clients and the public. One way nonprofit […]
A nonprofit embezzlement incident is emotionally devastating, causing nonprofit leaders to question their own judgment and management ability. It erodes […]
The recent high-profile ousterÂ of Southern Poverty Law Center CEO and Founder Morris Dees, and the resignation of Board Chair Richard Cohen, show how things can go awry when a board does not provide appropriate oversight.
The board collectively, and directors/trustees individually, owe fiduciary duties to the nonprofit organization they serve. In essence, exercising fiduciary duties means that board members have a duty to act with care and in the best interest of the organization and remain loyal to its mission, as opposed to acting in their own interest or the interest of the CEO/Executive Director they supervise.
A nonprofitâ€™s board of directors is legally responsible for exercising the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise in overseeing the organizationâ€™s operations. This includes the organizationâ€™s finances and legal compliance.
Foundations are required to expend approximately 5% of their assets for charitable purposes each year. The other 95% is invested to generate distributable income for future years. Historically, foundations have struggled with the idea of making riskier investments that further their charitable purposes, but do not qualify as a PRI because a significant purpose of the investment is the production of income or the appreciation of property.
The Washington Post has identified over 1,000 nonprofit organizations that have reported a â€œsignificant diversionâ€ of assets. Its important to note that there are over 1,616,000 tax-exempt nonprofits in the U.S. today; thus, these filings represent less than 1% of tax-exempt nonprofits. Itâ€™s also interesting to note that a quick review of Arizonaâ€™s list includes only 21 organizations – most of which reported the diversions in a clear, transparent, and confidence inspiring manner.